Ministry of Economic Development Home| Contact MED|


 
 
 

Links to this page were:

Section Subnavigation Links:

Hog Bristle Paintbrushes from China: Initiation Summary

[ Last Updated 25 January 2006 ]

25 October 2002

Contents

Type of Investigation

Dumping Review

Description of Goods

Hog bristle paintbrushes for household or industrial use

Country of Origin

China

Investigation "Milestones"

Date of Initiation:25 October 2002
Earliest date on which Provisional Measures may be imposed:1 
Latest date for release of Interim Report:223 March 2003
Latest date for completion of review by the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Economic Development:22 April 2003

Summary of Factors Leading to Initiation

Background

Anti-dumping duties were first imposed on hog bristle paintbrushes from China by the Minister of Customs on 31 May 1988. A notice to this effect was published in the New Zealand Gazette of 2 June 1988.

On 2 April 1992 the rate of anti-dumping duty was reassessed following a review which found that hog bristle paintbrushes from China were still being dumped and that the New Zealand industry would suffer material injury if the duties were to be removed. A notice of the reassessment was published in the New Zealand Gazette of 9 April 1992.

On 29 October 1997 the rate of anti-dumping duty was again reassessed following a further review which found that hog bristle paintbrushes were still being dumped and that the New Zealand industry would suffer material injury if the duties were to be removed. A notice of the reassessment was published in the New Zealand Gazette of 6 November 1997.

The current duties are imposed using reference prices in the form of Normal Value (Value for Duty Equivalent) (NV (VFDE) amounts in $US per brush for a range of sizes and types of paintbrush.

Reason for the Review

The anti-dumping duty would have expired on 29 October 2002 if a review had not been initiated before that date, as five years had passed since the last reassessment and review. The review was initiated at the request of the two New Zealand producers of paintbrushes, who provided positive evidence sufficient to justify the initiation of a review.

The purpose of the review is to establish whether the expiry of the duty would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury.

Further details of the background relating to anti-dumping duty on hog bristle paintbrushes and the reasons for the review, are contained in the Initiation Memorandum which is available from this site.

Review Process

Submissions are being sought from parties known to have an interest in this review, including known exporters and producers in China, importers and the New Zealand industry. These submissions will be examined and analysed by the review team. The outcome of this examination and analysis will then be reported, with recommendations, to the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Economic Development.

Notes

Importers of hog bristle paintbrushes from China of the type described above should note that the anti-dumping duty will continue to apply to these goods for the duration of the review.

If the review establishes that there is a continued need for anti-dumping duties, then a reassessment of the existing duties may be initiated on the completion of the review to establish the appropriate duty rate or amount and the method by which the duties are imposed. Any reassessment will draw on the results of the review.

Further Information

Any queries or requests for further information should be directed to the review team at the Trade Remedies Group on telephone +64-4-470 2273 (Robin Hill) or +64-4-470 2277 (Gabrielle Nixon), or facsimile +64-4-499 8508. Enquiries by e-mail should be directed to robin.hill@med.govt.nz or gabrielle.nixon@med.govt.nz.


1Provisional measures: The existing anti-dumping duties will continue to apply for the duration of this review. If the review shows that anti-dumping duties should continue to be imposed, a reassessment of the rate or amount of anti-dumping duty to be applied may be carried out. Provisional measures are not therefore an issue in these proceedings.

2Notice to parties to investigation: Section 10A(1) of the Dumping and Countervailing Duties Act provides as follows:

(1) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, within 150 days after the initiation of an investigation under section 10 of this Act, the [Chief Executive] shall give to the parties to the investigation referred to in section 9 (b) of this Act written advice of the essential facts and conclusions that will likely form the basis for any final determination to be made under section 13 of this Act.

Whilst the provision quoted above does not apply in the case of reviews, the Ministry attempts as far as possible in a review to follow normal investigation procedures. To this end, an interim report in the same format as is used for the release of essential facts and conclusions will, if practicable, be provided to known interested parties on or before 150 days following the initiation of the review.


Back to Top