Access to Traditional Knowledge in Archives - Presentation
[ Last Updated 5 May 2006 ]
Short Description
Presentation by Sandra Falconer as part of the World Intellectual Property Organisation - Principles and Policy Objectives for Protection of Traditional Knowledge Workshop, 3 April 2006.
Author
Sandra Falconer, Archives New Zealand
Slide 1: What Are Archives?
- Records of permanent value
- Provide accountability of government actions for the public
- Can be any format
Slide 2: What Does Archives New Zealand Do?
- Provides advice on recordkeeping
- Transfers records of permanent value when no longer required by agency
- Describes the context of those records e.g. who created them, and for what purpose
- Provides lists of those records, using the descriptions used by the creating agency
- Restricts access to records for specified periods for reasons of privacy, sensitivity, or preservation needs
Slide 3: What Does Archives New Zealand Not Do?
- Keep every record
- Examine every file
- Catalogue files by subject or re-describe them
- Collect information, this is actually done by each agency
- Make final access decisions, requests referred to agency
Slide 4: How Does Archives Determine Access Restrictions?
- Decisions based on legislation such OIA and Privacy Act, Copyright Act
- Ask agency to identify files that should be restricted
- Examine file titles for clues that contents may be sensitive and need restrictions, then examine sample files
- Look for existing agreements that affect access, and that should continue
Slide 5: What TK or TCE Are in Archives
- Whakapapa, descriptions of traditional boundaries, collected during land acquisition
- Photographs, films of cultural events and performance, collected by Tourism, Education, Arts Council Grants
- Any knowledge shared with government agencies through funding applications, advisory roles, education programmes, protection of wāhi tapu, RMA applications, or research
Slide 6: Key Issues for TK in Archives
- Currently no registration process for current holdings
- Key questions are asked too late
- There has been no process of informed consent
- No easy way to identify TK or the knowledge holders
- The size of our holdings. Approx. 4 million items would have to be examined for TK content. Who should do this?
Slide 7: What Can Be Done for Future Holdings?
- Potential to address issues through Recordkeeping Standards and Advice
- Each initial interaction between government and Māori is the best time to negotiate access
Slide 8: What If Traditional Knowledge Was Identified When Records Are Created?
- Could determine the level of information required to create an accurate record for future accountability. Does this need to include TK?
- Could determine who owns this information
- Could determine if the information needs a level of protection. Who by? For how long?
Slide 9: What Information Would Need to Be Kept about TK Content?
- Clear statements of ownership and identification of any restrictions
- Establish a contact person/position for agencies and Māori for queries and requests for access
- Establish on-going communication about the records status and location
- Keep this information with the records over time
Slide 10: Potential Benefits
- Can define the boundaries between information necessary for accountability and evidence, and what is too much detail for the public domain
- Asserts ownership and rights of Māori to specific information
- Allows on-going Māori control of information given to external agencies
- Can establish procedures to protect information adequately and appropriately where necessary
- Any legal constraints, e.g. "given in confidence" can be documented at source
- Archives New Zealand can maintain agreements if record is transferred i.e. Government's end of the agreement is maintained over time, regardless of who has custody of the records
Slide 11: Would This Process Meet the WIPO Policy Objectives?
- Recognise Value
- Promote Respect
- Meet the actual needs of knowledge holders
- Promote conservation and preservation of TK
- Empower holders of TK and acknowledge the distinctive nature of TK systems
- Support TK systems
- Contribute to safeguarding TK
- Repress unfair and inequitable uses
- Concord with relevant international agreements and processes
- Promote innovation and creativity
- Ensure prior informed consent and exchanges based on mutually agreed terms
- Promote equitable benefit sharing
- Promote Community development and legitimate trading activities
- Preclude the grant of improper IP rights to unauthorised parties
- Enhance transparency and mutual confidence
- Complement protection of traditional cultural expressions
Back to Top