Ministry of Economic Development Home| Contact MED|


 
 
 

Links to this page were:

Section Subnavigation Links:

3. Education


08/06: Assessing Agglomeration Impacts in Auckland: Phase 2

John Williamson, Richard Paling, Ramon Staheli and David Waite
[ Last Updated 20 March 2008 ]


A large body of the agglomeration literature suggests that the concentration of skilled workers is central to the productivity advantages achieved in cities. In this section we review research that has examined the effect/impact of human capital on employment growth, firm birth rates, land prices, the location decisions of firms and the location decisions of young workers among others.

Our empirical research then investigates the correlation between educational attainment and incomes in employment areas, as well as the relationship between educational attainment and sectors in employment areas in Auckland.

3.1 Literature Review

The literature consistently states that increasing the educational attainment and skills of workers, is essential to improve the economic productivity of cities. We now examine this literature in closer detail.

3.1.1 Theoretical

Moretti notes that productivity spillovers from "human capital arise if the presence of educated workers makes other workers more productive. In the presence of such spillovers, an increase in aggregate human capital may have an effect on aggregate productivity that is quite different from the effect of an increase in individual education on individual earnings".21 Lucas' research provides support for this, holding that human capital increases the productivity of the individual, and, at an aggregate level, contributes to the productivity of all factors of production.

The human capital literature infers that highly educated workers are the primary vehicles of knowledge spillovers.22 As Rosenthal & Strange note: "this seems to be what Marshall had in mind in his discussion of Sheffield cutlery workers taking advantage of the secrets of their trade that are available as local public goods".23

Rosenthal & Strange, in their research on human capital spillovers, note that there is no conclusive evidence as to the mechanisms that give effect to human capital spillovers, however. They note: "learning is only one of the mechanisms by which agglomeration can impact productivity and wages".24 Moretti notes moreover: "Despite the important policy implications and a large theoretical literature that assumes the existence of human capital externalities, the empirical literature on the magnitude of these externalities is still young. Given the limited number of empirical studies on this subject, it is still too early to draw definitive conclusions on the size of the externalities".25

Le, Gibson & Oxley's research provides an outline of the three major approaches taken in the literature to measure human capital: cost-based, income and education. Their conclusion is that while each approach has its merits, each also has its shortcomings (missing key elements of human capital and poor data), leading to a lack of empirical consensus.26

3.1.2 Empirical

The following table provides a brief summary of some key empirical studies on human capital, before a more detailed discussion is provided below.

Table 3.1 Empirical Studies of Human Capital
Author Key Finding
Shapiro27 Found a positive relationship between an increase in a city's concentration of college-educated (university) residents and an increase in employment growth.
Acs & Armington28 Find a positive relationship between firm birth rates in a region and the proportion of university graduates in the region.
Cooke29 Research on the location of biotechnology firms, finds that new economy firms cluster in proximity to knowledge sources (particularly universities).

Cooke's research is further supported by Glaeser, who remarks that the presence of skilled workers strongly influences firm location decisions and that "policy should worry about attracting people at least as much as attracting firms".30 Similarly, in the economic geography literature, Simmie argues that skilled workers are a primary driver of the location decisions made by innovation led firms.31

Combes, Duranton & Gobillon find that up to half of the spatial wage disparities, commonly associated with agglomeration benefits, can be traced back to differences in the skill composition of the workforce. In this regard, workers with better labour market characteristics tend to sort themselves into large cities.32 Further research needs to be developed, to generate a more precise understanding of the sorting of skilled workers into cities, however. The scholarship of Nocke, and Glaeser & Maré (who point to the importance of vocational learning in cities), offer potential insights, whilst the appeal of urban amenities to skilled workers also appears to be relevant.33

Peri's research modelled the location decisions of young and old workers as a function of human capital externalities.34 Although young educated workers were found to receive a lower wage premium in urban areas, relative to experienced workers, they were over-represented in urban areas due to learning opportunities. In this respect, learning adds to human capital, which is seen to be more important for young workers than for older workers. This effect seems to be apparent here, with research indicating that young workers are attracted to Auckland.35

Toulemonde's research found that firms want to settle in close proximity to high-skilled workers because they earn more money and thus stimulate demand.36 Moreover, Toulemonde identified a circular causality given that workers are eager to invest in the acquisition of skills when more firms ask for skilled workers.

Rosenthal & Strange's empirical research in metropolitan areas in the U.S links different levels of worker education, and shifts in workers' educational attainment, to productivity in cities. The authors note: "proximity to college educated workers is shown to enhance productivity and wages, while proximity to less than college educated workers has the opposite effect".37

3.1.3 Emerging Areas

Combes & Duranton suggest that the diffusion of knowledge within an economy is critically dependent on the "churning" of the labour force, or in other words, the movement of skilled workers from firm to firm.38 The authors note: "Many case studies strongly support the idea that workers, when they change employers, come with knowledge about their former employer and that this knowledge can be profitably used by their new employer".39 This builds on the earlier work of Saxenian, who examined the relationship between the churning of high skilled labour and knowledge diffusion in Silicon Valley.40

Similar to the research of Saxenian and Combes & Duranton, an emerging branch of the agglomeration literature suggests that the economic productivity advantages of cities can be partly attributed to informal networks, where skilled workers generate and benefit from knowledge spillovers. In this regard, Storper & Venables consider face-to-face contact to be a missing aspect amongst the mechanisms known to give rise to agglomerations.41

Saxenian's analysis of Silicon Valley as a key innovation-led economy, also illustrated the significance of informal networks between skilled workers that are enabled by spatial proximity. She notes: "informal conversations were pervasive and served as an important source of up-to-date information about competitors, customers, markets and technologies… such exchanges are more able to take place in a close knit environment, where the relatively close proximity of companies makes associations easier".42

Furthermore, Moretti recalls the research of Glaeser,43 Peri,44 Jovanovic & Rob45 and Black & Henderson,46 who, in exploring human capital spillovers in urban areas, found that individuals improve and add to their human capital through meetings with skilled neighbours where ideas are exchanged.47

Whilst, in this phase of research, we provide no empirical examination of informal networks in the Auckland economy, an awareness of this emerging literature is helpful in providing insights into the way human capital and knowledge spillover processes may be leading to agglomeration benefits in Auckland's CBD.

3.2 Auckland Findings

Having reviewed the literature on the effects of knowledge and its transmission in supporting agglomeration, we now turn our attention to the observed position in Auckland. While there is no empirical information on the interchange of information, there is information on the educational levels of the workforce and its wage productivity on a sectoral and geographical basis. Using this information we can identify whether differences in education levels can explain, in some part, the higher productivity of workers in the CBD.

The level of educational attainment for those working in the CBD, in Auckland City and the Auckland Region is set out in Table 3.2, following the definitions used by Statistics New Zealand.

Table 3.2 Breakdown of Workforce by Educational Attainment: Auckland Region 2001
Highest Educational Qualification Numbers Employed
Per cent of total employment
CBD Auckland City Auckland Region CBD Auckland City Auckland Region
No Qualification 3711 25,086 70,944 6.5% 11.9% 15.2%
Fifth Form Qualification 5706 25,233 63,984 10.0% 12.0% 13.7%
Sixth Form Qualification 7197 24,879 54,531 12.6% 11.8% 11.7%
Higher School Qualification 5148 15,642 30,927 9.0% 7.4% 6.6%
Other NZ Secondary School Qualification 15 84 285 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%
Overseas Secondary School Qualification 4185 16,329 36,591 7.3% 7.8% 7.8%
Basic Vocational Qualification 2733 9,360 20,427 4.8% 4.4% 4.4%
Skilled Vocational Qualification 2127 9,852 25,815 3.7% 4.7% 5.5%
Intermediate Vocational Qualification 1284 4,692 10,686 2.2% 2.2% 2.3%
Advanced Vocational Qualification 5346 21,783 46,728 9.4% 10.4% 10.0%
Bachelor Degree 12600 33,813 58,359 22.1% 16.1% 12.5%
Higher Degree 5679 15,387 25,803 9.9% 7.3% 5.5%
Highest Qualification Unidentifiable 1146 6,936 19,065 2.0% 3.3% 4.1%
Not Stated 249 1,401 3,501 0.4% 0.7% 0.7%
Total 57129 210,456 467,643 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
"Advanced Educational Attainment"(1) 24771 77,919 149,955 43.4% 37.0% 32.1%

Source 2001 Census, Statistics New Zealand

Notes (1) Advanced Educational Attainment includes those with Advanced Vocational Qualifications and Bachelors and Higher Degrees

In general, the CBD demonstrates higher levels of educational attainment in its workforce, with higher proportions of workers with both bachelor and higher degrees, than either Auckland Region or Auckland City. Within the CBD, 43 per cent of employees have degrees or an advanced occupational qualification, compared to 37 per cent in Auckland City and 32 per cent in the Region. The proportion of workers with no qualification in the CBD, is also less than half of that for the Region, and significantly lower than that for Auckland City.

The differences in education levels between the CBD and the Auckland Region are also repeated at a sectoral level as can be seen in Table 3.3.

Table 3.3 Proportion of Workforce with Advanced Educational Attainment (1) by Industry Sector
Sector CBD Region
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 22% 16%
Mining NA 11%
Manufacturing 22% 15%
Electricity, Gas and Water Supply NA 40%
Construction 24% 11%
Wholesale Trade 35% 22%
Retail Trade 23% 12%
Accommodation, Cafes and Restaurants 19% 14%
Transport and Storage 26% 18%
Communication Services 34% 24%
Finance and Insurance 40% 32%
Property and Business Services 52% 41%
Government Administration and Defence 50% 37%
Education 72% 65%
Health and Community Services 52% 50%
Cultural and Recreational Services 36% 30%
Personal and other Services 37% 25%
Not Elsewhere Included 35% 17%
Total 43% 32%

Source 2001 Census, Statistics New Zealand

Notes (1) Degree plus advanced vocational qualification

In all the sectors identified, the proportion of workers with higher educational attainment levels is higher for the CBD than for the region, even for activities like retail or construction where the educational levels are typically relatively low. The better qualified workforce may contribute to the area's productivity performance therefore.

3.2.1 Earnings & Education

The relationship between average earnings for workers with different educational qualifications is set out in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4 Average Earnings by Educational Level: Auckland City, Auckland Region and Auckland CBD ($pa)
Educational Attainment Average Annual Earnings ($pa) Earnings as % of average earnings for area
CBD Auckland City Auckland Region CBD Auckland City Auckland Region
No Qualification 33100 30400 28100 70% 74% 76%
Fifth Form Qualification 40600 35800 32100 85% 87% 87%
Sixth Form Qualification 44300 39400 35100 93% 96% 95%
Higher School Qualification 34600 32200 29400 73% 78% 79%
Other NZ Secondary School Qualification 17900 12400 23500 38% 30% 64%
Overseas Secondary School Qualification 38000 33000 30500 80% 80% 82%
Basic Vocational Qualification 38100 35200 32600 80% 86% 88%
Skilled Vocational Qualification 45600 43400 40700 96% 106% 110%
Intermediate Vocational Qualification 44700 42300 40300 94% 103% 109%
Advanced Vocational Qualification 50500 44900 42400 106% 109% 115%
Bachelor Degree 60000 53700 51000 126% 131% 138%
Higher Degree 65300 60900 58400 137% 148% 158%
Highest Qualification Unidentifiable 32800 29500 27500 69% 72% 74%
Not Stated 32100 26600 26400 67% 65% 71%
Average – All Education Levels 47600 41100 37000 100% 100% 100%
Average - Advanced Educational Attainment 57900 50500 46600 124% 128% 133%

Source 2001 Census, Statistics New Zealand

Higher educational levels are typically linked to higher average earnings. Within the CBD, those with some form of advanced educational qualification earn on average 22 per cent more than the average for the CBD, and those with higher degrees earn 40 per cent more than the CBD average. For Auckland, the earnings of those with a Bachelors degree are 38 per cent above the regional average, and those with a Higher Degree are almost 60 per cent above the regional average.

The higher proportions of workers with advanced educational qualifications in the CBD will be a factor contributing to the higher wage rates in the area, although, as Table 3.4 has demonstrated, earnings are higher in the CBD within particular educational categories, giving a possible indication of agglomeration benefits.

In Table 3.5 below, we set out the average earnings for workers in each of the sectors for the Region and for the Auckland CBD, and the proportions of those who have Advanced Educational Attainment. To assess the impact of the differences between those with different educational levels in the CBD and the Region as a whole the following steps were undertaken:

The average wage rate for those with and without advanced educational attainment were determined for those working within each sector in each CAU.

Revised wage rates within each sector/CAU combination were estimated assuming that the split by education type within each sector was the same as that for the Region as a whole.

Revised average wage rates were determined for the CBD as a whole by sector and in total and compared to the regional averages.

The results are set out in Table 3.5.

Table 3.5 Average Earnings by Education Type Auckland Region and Auckland CBD 2001
Auckland Region Auckland CBD Auckland CBD averages with Regional Educational Split
Sector

% of work-force with AEA Wages: Observed Regional Averages for Sector Work-force % of work-force with AEA Wages: Observed CBD Averages for Sector Work-force % of work-force with AEA Estimated Average Earnings with Regional Educational Split
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 16% 28,500 22% 43900 16% 46100
Mining** 11% 46,900
Manufacturing 15% 37,400 22% 41800 15% 41100
Electricity, Gas and Water Supply** 40% 53100
Construction 11% 37200 24% 48400 11% 45400
Wholesale Trade 22% 42800 35% 57000 22% 54500
Retail Trade 12% 24500 23% 26900 12% 26300
Accommodation, Cafes and Restaurants 14% 20100 19% 24200 14% 23700
Transport and Storage 18% 39500 26% 43000 18% 42500
Communication Services 24% 42200 34% 52400 24% 50300
Finance and Insurance 32% 50,400 40% 57400 32% 55500
Property and Business Services 41% 47600 52% 57500 41% 54800
Government Administration and Defence 37% 40200 50% 43700 37% 41700
Education 65% 35000 72% 41000 65% 40200
Health and Community Services 50% 35200 52% 38300 50% 37900
Cultural and Recreational Services 30% 33600 36% 40700 30% 40200
Personal and other Services 25% 31500 37% 39300 25% 38500
Not Elsewhere Included 17% 23200 35% 42800 17% 39900
Total 32% 37,000 43% 47600 32% 45800

Source 2001 Census, Statistics New Zealand

Notes (1) AEA = Advanced Educational Attainment
** These are very small sectors

On the basis of the CBD split, the average wage rate at about $47,600 is about 29 per cent above the regional average of $37,000, with 43 per cent of the workforce in the CBD with advanced educational attainment. However, if educational attainment was in line with the regional averages for each sector, giving a total of only 32 per cent of the CBD workforce having advanced educational qualifications, wage rates at $45,800 would be about 24 per cent above the Regional average. Differences in educational attainment therefore, only account for about 17 per cent of the differences in wages rates and productivity between the CBD and the Region as a whole.

There is also an issue as to whether the higher proportion of the workforce with advanced educational qualifications within the CBD is itself an inherent component of agglomeration, rather than a separate factor. The literature outlined above, notes that skilled workers tend to congregate in cities. While controlling for educational attainment allows pure agglomeration benefits to be examined, it still leaves one to question whether the relationship between the preferences of skilled workers who predominantly choose to work in cities, and the agglomeration benefits that arise in cities, might be important.

3.3 Summary

Our empirical research finds that educational attainment in the CBD is higher than attainment in Auckland City and in the Auckland Region. While there is clear evidence that improved education is linked with higher earnings, the differences in education levels between the CBD and the Region as a whole mean that, perhaps surprisingly, education accounts for only 15-20% of the urban wage premium achieved in the CBD.

Our empirical research supports the general findings in the literature about the positive relationship between educated workers and productivity improvements in agglomerated employment areas, although this only appears to explain a relatively limited part of the productivity advantages experienced in the CBD. However, more primary research is required to determine whether, for instance, the skilled workers in the CBD are involved and benefiting from knowledge spillovers in informal networks, and whether high skilled workers are opting to work in the CBD due to learning opportunities and urban amenities.



21 Moretti (2004).

22 Moretti (2004), Rauch (1993), and Acemoglu & Angrist (2000).

23 Rosenthal & Strange (2004).

24 Rosenthal & Strange (2005).

25 Moretti (2004).

26 Le, Gibson & Oxley (2005).

27 Shapiro (2005).

28 Acs & Armington (2004).

29 Cooke (2002).

30 Glaeser (2005) as cited in Grimes (2007).

31 Simmie (2005).

32 Combes, Duranton & Gobillon (2003).

33 Nocke (2003) and Glaeser & Maré (2001).

34 Peri (2002).

35 Pool, Baxendine, Cochrane & Lindop (2006).

36 Toulemonde (2006).

37 Rosenthal & Strange (2005).

38 Combes & Duranton (2006).

39 Combes & Duranton (2006).

40 Saxenian (1996).

41 Storper & Venables (2004).

42 Saxenian (1996).

43 Glaeser (1999).

44 Peri (2002).

45 Jovanovic & Rob (1989).

46 Black & Henderson (1999).

47 Moretti (2004).



Back to Top