Ministry of Economic Development Home| Contact MED|


 
 
 

Links to this page were:

Section Subnavigation Links:

Policy Advice and Ministerial Servicing


This Document is Archived


Annual Report of the Ministry of Economic Development for the Year Ended 30 June 2007

[ Last Updated 10 October 2007 ]


Quality Assurance Processes

The Ministry has a formal policy framework within which all policy issues may be assessed, options developed and analysed, and consultation with interested parties effected. This framework is consistent with the processes employed by many other government agencies, and helps ensure consistency of approach and focus throughout the Ministry and with broader government policy. Consultation with interested parties is undertaken throughout this process, and advice from the Ministry's Legal Directorate is also sought where appropriate.

Within the policy framework, significant influences on the quality of output delivery included:

  • gauging of Ministers' satisfaction through regular (usually weekly) meetings, which provide frequent opportunities for feedback on the level of satisfaction with the quality of advice and reporting (the Chief Executive also had discussions with each Minister on the Ministry's performance and forward work programme as part of the Ministry's regular review processes);
  • standard quality assurance procedures applied throughout the Ministry, which require that all reports to Ministers and letters for their signature are normally signed out by a Deputy Secretary, a director, a manager or a senior advisor depending on the complexity or sensitivity of the issue being dealt with; and
  • consultation with external groups on an informal basis or the release of discussion papers on which formal submissions are received.

Standards for Policy Advice

The Ministry will seek a six-monthly written response from Ministers on its performance against the following quality standards:

Quantity

Project work is agreed in the year's work programme, and modified by agreement between Ministers, the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Economic Development and, where appropriate, the General Manager of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs and the General Manager of the Ministry of Tourism in the course of the year.

Coverage

The Ministry provides a comprehensive service that:

  • has the capacity to react urgently;
  • offers timely and relevant briefings on significant issues; and
  • supports Ministers as required in Cabinet Committees, Select Committees and the House.

Quality

The Ministry supplies high-quality individual products conforming to the quality characteristics outlined below and assessed by the Ministers' satisfaction, as reported in the Ministers' response sheets.

Quality Characteristics

Purpose

An objective for the policy advice has been clearly stated including its relationship to the Government's desired outcomes and objectives.

Focus

There is a clear and logical statement of the issue or problem and why it necessitates Ministerial action.

Viability

Viable options to address the issue are presented, and the costs/benefits and winners/losers for each (relative to the policy objective) are assessed and any value judgement is brought to the attention of Ministers.

Logic

The assumptions behind the advice, and the logic of how options will resolve issues and achieve objectives, are clear.

Accuracy

The facts are accurate and based on reliable research or evaluation findings or other appropriate information.

Practicality

The advice draws on appropriate knowledge and experience, and the practicalities of implementing it are clearly explained, including any legal, machinery of government, Treaty of Waitangi, or other issues or risks that require management.

Consultation

Interested government agencies and affected parties have been consulted and their views considered.

Presentation

The advice is presented clearly, logically, in plain and grammatically correct English, and is free from any typographical or spelling errors, and conforms to Cabinet Office requirements.

Recommendations

Recommendations are clear, logical, action oriented and can stand alone from the rest of the advice.

Timeliness

Specified reporting deadlines are met.

Cost

The final cost is within budget. This is assessed by comparing the final cost with the Estimates of Appropriations.

Ministerial Servicing Standards

All draft Ministerial correspondence is submitted to the Minister within 10 working days of receipt in the Ministry.

Where only an interim reply is possible, a final reply shall be provided within the following timeframes:

  • 90% within 20 working days of the original receipt in the Ministry; and
  • 100% within 30 working days of receipt in the Ministry.

Parliamentary questions and Ministerial correspondence are responded to within agreed and statutory time frames. Quantities of Ministerial servicing for each output expense are as stated in the table set out in this report. (Performance standards are in brackets.)

Ministerial Servicing Performance

(Standards are in brackets where applicable)

Vote Economic, Industry and Regional Development

Quantity and Timeliness Output Expense
Policy Advice and Sector Leadership – Firm Capability, Sectoral and Regional Development Policy Advice – Small Business
Ministerial Correspondence Actual (Estimated) 111 (80–100) 48 (60–80)
100% submitted within 10 working days 97% 88%14
Interim replies provided: No interim replies No interim replies
90% within 20 working days N/A N/A
100% within 30 working days N/A N/A
Parliamentary Questions Actual (Estimated) 852 (120)15 70 (30)

Vote Commerce

Quantity and Timeliness Output Expense
Policy and Purchase Advice – Business Law and Competition Policy Admini-stration of Part II Tariff Concessions Admini-
stration of Trade Remedies
Registration and Granting of Intellectual Property Rights Admini-
stration of Insolvencies
Registration and Provision of Statutory Information
Ministerial Correspondence Actual (Estimated) 189 (150–200) 1 (0–5) 0 (0–5) 2 (0–10) 23 (10–20) 20 (0–10)
100% submitted within 10 working days 96% 100% N/A 100% 96% 100%
Interim replies provided: No interim replies No interim replies No interim replies No interim replies No interim replies No interim replies
90% within 20 working days N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
100% within 30 working days N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Parliamentary Questions Actual (Estimated) 125 (50–75) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Vote Communications

Quantity and Timeliness Output Expense
Policy Advice –Communications Management and Enforcement of the Radiocommunications Act 1989
Ministerial Correspondence Actual (Estimated) 347 (300–350) 0 (0–10)
100% submitted within 10 working days 88% N/A
Interim replies provided: No interim replies No interim replies
90% within 20 working days N/A N/A
100% within 30 working days N/A N/A
Parliamentary Questions Actual (Estimated) 52 (20–50) 0 (0)

Vote Consumer Affairs

Quantity and Timeliness Output Expense
Policy Advice and Support – Consumer Issues Enforcement and Conformance
Ministerial Correspondence Actual (Estimated) 144 (60–80) 30 (10–15)
100% submitted within 10 working days 95% 100%
Interim replies provided: No interim replies No interim replies
90% within 20 working days N/A N/A
100% within 30 working days N/A N/A
Parliamentary Questions Actual (Estimated) 33 (10–15) 0 (0)

Vote Energy

Quantity and Timeliness Output Expense
Policy Advice – Energy and Resource Issues Management of the Crown Mineral Estate Administration of Gas and Electricity Regulations Provision of Climate Change Register and Information Energy and Resource Information Services
Ministerial Correspondence Actual (Estimated) 412 (600–700) 38 (40–50) 41 (33) 3 (0-10) 7 (20–50)
100% submitted within 10 working days 96% 97% 95% 100% 86%16
Interim replies provided: No interim replies No interim replies No interim replies No interim replies No interim replies
90% within 20 working days N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
100% within 30 working days N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Parliamentary Questions Actual (Estimated) 76 (80–120) 0 (0) 8 (0–5) 0 (0–5) 0 (0–5)

Vote Tourism

Quantity and Timeliness Output Expense
Policy Advice – Tourism
Ministerial Correspondence Actual (Estimated) 103 (200)
100% submitted within 10 working days 90%17
Interim replies provided: No interim replies
90% within 20 working days N/A
100% within 30 working days N/A
Parliamentary Questions Actual (Estimated) 46 (80)

Performance against Policy Advice Standards (by Vote)

Economic,
Industry and Regional Development
Commerce Commun-
ications
Consumer Affairs Energy Tourism
Quality
The Ministry's Policy Framework provides that advice has the quality characteristics listed above.
Coverage
Provision of a comprehensive service that: has the capacity to react urgently; offers timely and relevant briefings on significant issues; and supports Ministers as required in Cabinet Committees, Select Committees and the House. (4) for policy advice services provided in the first half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the first half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the first half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the first half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the first half-year No feedback provided
The Ministers' feedback is within the range (3) "met my expectations" to (5) "greatly exceeded my expectations" in the regular review of the Ministry's performance.18 (3) for policy advice services provided in the second half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the second half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the second half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the second half-year (4) for policy advice services provided in the second half-year No feedback provided

14 Some minor delays occurred when responses involved liaison and coordination with other individuals and groups to ensure thoroughness and accuracy and to seek clarification by the Minister’s Office.

15 Vote Economic, Industry and Regional Development received higher than forecast Parliamentary Questions primarily due to a high number of questions on previous responses and an increased number directed at NZTE.

16 The technical nature of the required response led to a late extension being sought.

17 Internal systems error resulted in the late recording of 10 Ministerials received to 31 January 2007. Issue identified and resolved for final report.

18 The range is: (1) was not satisfactory; (2) fell short of my expectations in some respects; (3) met my expectations; (4) met and sometimes exceeded my expectations; (5) greatly exceeded my expectations.



Back to Top