Ministry of Economic Development Home| Contact MED|


 
 
 

Links to this page were:

Section Subnavigation Links:

Appendix 1: Issues Not Carried Forward to the Position Paper


This Document is Archived


Position Paper on Utilities and the Road, Motorway and Rail Corridors

Energy and Communications Branch
[ Last Updated 18 October 2006 ]


A small number of issues were raised during earlier discussions and in submissions that the Ministry of Economic Development proposes not be addressed in policy recommendations to Ministers. These are summarised below.

Statutory framework for NZ Utilities Advisory Group

Submissions on this issue did not support a statutory role for the NZUAG, and none is proposed. However the value of codes of practice, standards, and model agreements developed in collaboration has been recognised in the proposed process by which the Minister can give status to, and promulgate such codes and standards. It is envisaged that codes and standards recommended to the Minister in the future would include those developed by the NZUAG (among others).

It emerged from the analysis of submissions that areas such as nationally consistent cost-sharing practices required further consideration and the close involvement of stakeholders. The NZUAG and the proposed process for establishing codes and standards provide an appropriate framework for further progress.

Networks laid by other parties

This proposed policy framework for utilities will not be extended to cover pipelines and other assets placed by people or organisations other than defined utility providers.

It was submitted in response to the draft position paper that networks such as high capacity electricity transmission should be included in the policy framework. DigSafe, a third party utility/location information service provider, noted that any network operator (e.g. local fibre optic provider; transmission operator) can take part in its services.

A statutory requirement to lay utility ducts in new roads

The balance of submissions was generally against this proposal, and a number of practical and cost-related issues emerged. It is not proposed to address this matter in the policy framework.


Back to Top