Ministry of Economic Development Home| Contact MED|


 
 
 

Links to this page were:

Section Subnavigation Links:

Quality Standards for Policy Advice and Ministerial Servicing


This Document is Archived


Statement of Intent 2005-2008

[ Last Updated 12 January 2006 ]


Quality Management

The quality of policy advice will be supported by a quality management process including:

  • an external review of scope and methodology for major analytical work;
  • circulation of drafts for critiquing by other government agencies and other parties as appropriate;
  • internal peer review and checking procedures; and
  • adherence to the Ministry's Policy Framework.

Note: A large part of the Ministry's policy advice requires the co-operation of other government agencies and is determined by the priorities and timetables of Cabinet and its Committees. The Ministry's performance in terms of the standards may be affected by these factors which are outside its control. These factors will be included in the assessment process and will be acknowledged whenever they impact performance.

Policy Advice

The Ministry will seek a written response, at least six-monthly, from Ministers on its performance against the following quality standards.

Quantity

Project work is agreed in the year's work programme, and modified by agreement between Ministers, the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Economic Development and, where appropriate, the General Manager of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs and the General Manager of the Ministry of Tourism in the course of the year.

Quality

The Ministry will supply high-quality individual products conforming to the quality characteristics outlined below and assessed by the Ministers' satisfaction, as reported in the Ministers' six-monthly response sheets.

Coverage

The Ministry will provide a comprehensive service that:

  • has the capacity to react urgently;
  • offers timely and relevant briefings on significant issues; and
  • supports Ministers as required in Cabinet Committees, Select Committees and in the House.

Quality Characteristics

Purpose

An objective for the policy advice has been clearly stated, including its relationship to the Government's desired outcomes and objectives.

Focus

There is a clear and logical statement of the issue or problem and why it necessitates Ministerial action.

Viability

Viable options to address the issue are presented and the costs/benefits and winners/losers for each (relative to the policy objective) are assessed, and any value judgement is brought to the attention of Ministers.

Logic

The assumptions behind the advice and the logic of how options will resolve issues and achieve objectives are clear.

Accuracy

The facts are accurate and based on reliable research or evaluation findings or other appropriate information.

Practicality

The advice draws on appropriate knowledge and experience and the practicalities of implementing it are clearly explained, including any legal, machinery of government, Treaty of Waitangi, or other issues or risks that require management.

Consultation

Interested government agencies and affected parties have been consulted and their views considered.

Presentation

The advice is presented clearly, logically, in plain and grammatically correct English, free from any typographical or spelling errors, and conforms to Cabinet Office requirements.

Recommendations

Recommendations are clear, logical, action-oriented and can stand alone from the rest of the advice.

Timeliness

Specified reporting deadlines are met.

Cost

The outturn is within budget. This is assessed by comparing the outturn with the Estimates of Appropriations.

Ministerial Servicing Performance

Draft replies to Ministerial correspondence are to be submitted to Ministers within 10 working days of receipt in the Ministry in 100% of cases in all Votes.

Parliamentary questions and Ministerial correspondence will be responded to within agreed and statutory timeframes. Expected quantities of Ministerial servicing for each output class will be as stated in the table set out in this report.

Performance Measures for Departmental Output Classes

This section describes the generic and specific output class performance measures and performance standards for departmental policy advice output classes provided to Ministers in 2005/2006.

Generic Standards and Measures for Policy Advice

The generic performance measures and standards for policy advice, included in Quality Standards for Policy Advice and Ministerial Servicing and those set out below, apply specifically to the following output classes:

Vote: Economic, Industry and Regional Development

  • Policy Advice - Economic, Industry and Regional Development
  • Policy Advice - Small Business

Vote: Commerce

  • Policy Advice - Business and Competition

Vote: Communications

  • Policy Advice - Communications

Vote: Consumer Affairs

  • Policy Advice on Consumer Issues

Vote: Energy

  • Policy Advice on Energy and Resource Issues
  • Management of the Crown Mineral Estate

Vote: Tourism

  • Policy Advice - Tourism

2005/2006 Performance Measures and Standards

Quantity

Work Programme

Policy advice will be delivered in accordance with the prioritised requirements of a work programme negotiated annually with the Minister, or as amended by the Minister during the course of the year.

Ministerial servicing in the form of letters and parliamentary questions is undertaken as required by the Minister.

Quality

The Ministry's Policy Framework includes the quality characteristics listed in the sections above that apply to policy advice and to Ministerial servicing as appropriate.

In respect of policy advice, Ministerial servicing and the provision of advice on Crown entity governance (including the Crown's ownership interest and any risks and issues):

  • Ministers' feedback will be within the range (3) "met my expectations" to (5) "greatly exceeded my expectations" in the six-monthly review of the Ministry's performance.23

Timeliness

100% of reports and oral advice to the Minister are delivered within the timeframes required by, and agreed with, the Minister.

100% of draft Ministerial correspondence is submitted to the Minister within 10 working days of receipt in the Ministry.

Where only an interim reply is possible, a final reply shall be provided within the following timeframes:

  • 90% within 20 working days of the original receipt in the Ministry, and 100% within 30 working days of receipt in the Ministry.

Advice to the Minister on statutory appointments to Crown entity boards as positions for renewal or appointment fall due.

  • 100% within agreed timelines.

23The range is (1) was not satisfactory, (2) fell short of my expectations in some respects, (3) met my expectations, (4) met and sometimes exceeded my expectations, and (5) greatly exceeded my expectations.



Back to Top